Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complete List of all Kings and Queens of Narnia

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:19, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Complete List of all Kings and Queens of Narnia
This article is not factual, it is an invention by a fan and is an effort by this person to fill in gaps in an official author's timeline. There is already a proper timeline of the King and Queens of Narnia that is based on sources written by C.S Lewis. I consider this article to be mere conjecture and original research, which is not part of Wikipedia's policy.
 * Delete: Original "research". Fanfic. Wikibofh 14:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless proof can be provided that Lewis confirmed the existence of these monarchs by name. There's already a page on List of the Kings and Queens of Narnia and one on Disputed Kings and Queens of Narnia. Mr Bound 14:12, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, my vote's solidified now. Derf. Delete mercilessly. Mr Bound 14:54, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as fan speculation - article states It is not based upon any text which has been written by C.S. Lewis. Average Earthman 14:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. --Ian Pitchford 14:32, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original "research" --Phroziac 14:56, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fancrufty original research. -- BD2412 talk 15:43, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
 * Edit to include only the canonical kings and queens of narnia (I think the ones with stars by their names right now, though this should be verified). This list is good, but the fancruft should be taken out - other than that, it seems quite useful. jglc | t | c 17:15, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * My bad. I didn't see the other extant lists. Definitely Strong Delete this sucker. jglc | t | c 17:15, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Silversmith Hewwo 19:37, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per WP:FICT, CSLewisfancruft, non-canonical, duplicates more correctly sourced material at the pages Mr Bound cited. Barno 20:01, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete,original research and fancrufty speculation. Mgm|(talk) 21:03, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect. -Sean Curtin
 * Delete as fanfic; the article admits as much. Firebug 03:32, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. fanfiction is notable only rarely. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:22, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .