Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CompletelyNovel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

CompletelyNovel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources here are primarily press releases or passing mentions. A lot of them are 404 and not easily findable in archives. The article was created by a user who is a name match for an author publishing via this company. Guy (Help!) 21:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Knox490 (talk) 20:30, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nom - I am unable to locate any references which meet the criteria for establishing notability. The references that are available are either PRIMARY sources or articles which rely extensively on quotations/interviews with people connected with the company, failing WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:08, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.