Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complykaro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sources have been debunked and that hasnt been challenged. The keep arguments amount to assertion and there is a refusal to bring specific sources forward for examination. On that basis the delete argument is stronger but im willing to userfy. Spartaz Humbug! 18:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Complykaro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable Indian compliance service provider, SPA-article. Sources are press releases, promotional marketing articles, and a few passing mentions as event organisators and interviewees. Article contains a lot of puffery and self-serving "we explain our vision" quotes (which could be fixed of course, if it was the only issue). Google search shows no other suitable sources for independent in-depth coverage. GermanJoe (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm seeing a good deal of secondary source coverage amongst multiple references. Article itself may require cleanup and NPOV fixes, but topic itself is notable. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 05:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Could you provide some examples of independent in-depth coverage about the organization please? I checked the current sources:
 * ref #1 appears to be self-written by the company founder (EP usually attributes own articles, this one starts with "Vishal Kedia ... informs that ...")
 * ref #2 is not accessible, but looks like an interview (which may contain additional independent coverage or not, impossible to tell)
 * ref #3 is a passing mention (interview quote)
 * ref #4 is a larger copy of ref #3, with 1 more interview sentence from the founder
 * ref #5 is not about the company, the organization is only mentioned in passing (and INVC accepts reader-contributed articles)
 * ref #6 is a self-written PR article (see the last 2 paragraphs)
 * ref #7 is a probably self-written summary for one of their own events (non-neutral language, site publishes reader-submitted articles, no author).
 * There is really not much independent coverage here, but maybe I am overlooking some other sources. GermanJoe (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I meant including searches at and elsewhere, not necessarily in the article itself at present. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  17:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  17:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  17:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as per, references don't have to be in the article (though it's helpful) to show that there's GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment (as nom) - I have now researched possible new sources for the third time with no success, and looked closely into several of the offered Google news results and other possible references. I did a lengthy WP:BEFORE check and a complete source check., , could you please provide 2 or 3 specific examples for this alleged independent in-depth coverage, with more than just passing mentions or self-written statements from the founder? Based on the currently available sources, both in the article and online, this promotional article (written by a company employee by the way) fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:ORG. GermanJoe (talk) 00:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister   talk  07:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cirt. Needs a rewrite but the writers on Wikipedia are stretched thin! (I'll do it, but only if there's a guarantee it won't be deleted!) --MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 01:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Userfy to - for his generous offer to bring this article up to snuff.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree with Onel5969's suggestion. If other sources really exist - although none of the contributors here have provided any specific examples after several requests -, working on the article in draft or userspace may be a reasonable outcome (see also the current WP:VPP discussion about "AfD culture", which might be relevant here). GermanJoe (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:39, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.