Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Component Career Counselor of the Year


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 02:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Component Career Counselor of the Year

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a non-notable award for an encyclopedia (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 10:39, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep meets notability guidelines. Is well referenced.  Most sources are from within the military but are coming from both primary ones (like the recruiting journal) and more general Army news sources outside of the recruiting areas (Ft. Drum's post newspaper) as well as a civilian sources (Sierra Vista Herald, Jet Magazine). RadioFan (talk) 12:45, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - obscure internal award for minor division of one country's military; coverage is not substantial, and tends to be coverage of the award winners for a given year, not the award itself. One of many articles by a professional U.S. Army recruiter seeking to increase the presence of army recruiting in Wikipedia by writing a series of articles on his section of the Army. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Orangemike Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, while there is coverage, it's largely first party. The secondary coverage isn't substantial enough to convince me of notability. Hairhorn (talk) 12:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obscure and non-notable prize. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.