Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Component Library for Cross Platform


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per Djm-leighpark's help. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:42, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Component Library for Cross Platform

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable subject that clearly fails WP:GNG as I was not able to find any significant coverage from reliable sources. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep The article has been vandalised and attacked by anon IP's, survive a good faith but albeit invalid removal by an administrator and now dragged three minutes after that to AfD in what seems to be a red-mist haze by a nom. given the article summary already indicated google scholar cites and further a check on google books yields quite a handful of results. I question if part of the reason the nom. has brought this here due to my work on Articles for deletion/AUFS.  Admittedly the article was in a poor reference state, but at some disruption to myself have added some references and cites which should do the needful.  I really question WP:BEFORE on his one given the google books that Template:Find sources AFD is giving me.  Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.