Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Component force

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 10:45, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)

Component force
This page has no potential to become encyclopedic. A "component force" is simply what you would expect from the words "component" and "force". It has no special meaning in mechanics. The example does not provide any particular insight. Art Carlson 20:05, 2005 Jan 25 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Author seems to be thinking of net force, but since this article is just an example, I'm not sure it warrants merging. --InShaneee 20:40, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Component force" appears to be used infrequently to mean a component of a force vector, but that wouldn't merit a separate article, and the existing article is about something else. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:45, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Perhaps this page should be merged with Static equilibrium instead, since the image is useful for something. &mdash;Brim 18:28, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)