Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer year


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Computer year

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neoligism. Found only one reference (http://www.clcsinc.com/computerage.htm), and that content's up to debate. Sigma 7 (talk) 20:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as Neo. Not in common usage, never heard it, and I'm an old fart who been working with computers 25 years.  P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 21:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. It's hard to be sure with two such common words but google seems to come back with few, if any hits, of this usage.  I've been in computing (studying or working) for ten years and as a hobby for quite some time before that and I've also never used the term used so in the abscence of references I can only assume it's not well used and so not notable. Dpmuk (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unreferenced neologism. Wikipedia is not a dictionary of vaguely humorous expressions. Note that Dog years isn't an entry either, merely a disambig. Qwfp (talk) 16:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.