Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computerized Performance System Disc Jockey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Computerized Performance System Disc Jockey
5% neologism, 95% hype. Three Google hits excluding Wikipedia. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 18:59, 9 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Neologism - The use of this newly-coined word, like Lewis Carroll's 'jabberwocky' is how terms come to being. The artical should remain as I created with edits to clearify time-line and clearification. Do a Google search for it's more common used term CPSDJ.
 * Above unsigned comment by user:Computer DJing, 20:22, 9 November 2005


 * Delete The inclusion of this article is being used to justify the inclusion of another afd candidate, Professor Jam. Sounds like very roundabout marketing ultimately.  Jasmol 21:15, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Searched for CPSDJ and it seems all references are to the convention or a certification program run by Professor Jam. Is there any evidence that computerized disc jockeying has affected the industry in any way and that the term CPSDJ is the standard accepted by most DJs? If there is, please present such evidence and I'll be happy to reconsider. -- howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 21:47, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Computer DJ and Digital DJ dwarf this reference on Google searches.  Most of the references to CPSDJ wrap back to a conference in Tampa, Florida.  It doen't appear to be what it claims to be: a legitimate industry standard. Durova 21:52, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 01:44, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.