Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computers In Personnel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Computers In Personnel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason DaveMiann (talk) 15:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

I am nominating this article for deletion because this article is basically self promotion of a company that has contributed nothing of significance to the HR industry does nothing different from the 10,000s of other software companies out in the world who would not qualify for a Wikipedia page. I've tried to work with this company to really increase the relevance of this page - which has resulted in them removing my edits - because it dilutes the brand. Wikipedia is not a google ranking mechanism - which is all they are using it for. This page contains no value, there are many other pages that take about HR software and business, that are more relevant.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 15.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails the guidelines at WP:NCORP. The article is unsourced, previously contained sources but the ones I find do not mention the company. Googling falls quickly into databases and first-party sources, nothing indicating notability. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - agree with nom, this does seem clearly promotional and of a non-notable company. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, the article reads like a company flyer on history instead of an article. Tivanir2 (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as this seems clear from the current article and my searches found nothing better considering notability and improvement at all. SwisterTwister   talk  05:26, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.