Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comte d'Orange et Etagniéres


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   18:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Comte d'Orange et Etagniéres
Apparent hoax See the articles talk page for more reasoning. studerby 00:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete For same reasons as in Etagniéres. Tarret 00:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  After reading the talk page and article, I researched the term. There were zero hits across the search engine board. Unless adequate WP:RS are shown, I have to vote delete based on it not being verifiable. -- moe .RON   talk  00:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Kinda sounds like "Count of Orange and Tangerines"? Danny Lilithborne 01:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Without question a hoax. Aplomado  talk 01:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources, and no WP:V -- Whpq 03:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Without question a hoax, no sources. --Barnaul 14:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A hoax - check edit history of author Seaphoto 19:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 05:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per above. Incidentally, Switzerland and the Swiss cantons have always been republics. Consequently, there have never been any "accepted titles of nobility in Switzerland" that I know of, even though the ruling families in some of the ancien régime cantons before the Napoleonic invasion were de facto nobility. Sandstein 17:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.