Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Con-Dom (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. This nomination has been open for a month and since courcelles didn't find the consensus sufficient to delete on the 24th I'm going to treat this as an uncontested PROD. If anybody wants this undeleted let me know. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:39, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Con-Dom
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable sources to verify the article. Also No charting records and probably not notable. Mattg82 (talk) 02:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC) Category:Relisted AfD debates
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 04:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC) Category:Relisted AfD debates
 * Delete Can't find good coverage. In the large list of releases may be two that satisfy wp:music#5 but I didn't find evidence of this. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:14, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.