Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConDrain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Due to low participation, this is closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 00:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

ConDrain

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence for notability: all the refs are local, Press releases, or both; good evidence for promotionalism: three pictures of the founders, extensive discussion of minor products.  DGG ( talk ) 07:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per, , . Northamerica1000(talk) 01:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Excess pictures were deleted, 04:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madasaged (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep - edited to remove traces of promotionalism and unnecessary discussion of products — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etakc (talk • contribs) 17:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.