Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Con rispetto parlando


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 20:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Con rispetto parlando

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Yet another film, tagged since April 2013, that is basically an IMdB mirror. A WP:BEFORE turned up film database sites, youtube videos, and other wikis. Nothing found that could help this film pass WP:NFILM, as it needs at least 2 reviews and none are to be found. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia...not a film database site. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep If it wasn't a notable film an author wouldn't have written over a page on it . Has coverage in all of the typical sites for Italian film and several mentions in books, not to mention has a notable cast and director.† Encyclopædius  11:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC++)
 * Keep. I see enough sources that discuss the movie. Is something going on here? I see the nominator in quick succession made AfD nominations for Meri Jung Ka Elaan, Con rispetto parlando, Una Lettera dall'Africa and Stray Bullet (1960 Mexican film), all started by the same user and all non-English mainstream films that obviously would have been discussed by the local media, as this one was. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, all of those films had 'film notability' tags on them and I almost exclusively send only articles with those tags to either PROD or AfD as I don't believe that articles should have that tag for years, as all of those articles do. Also,if an editor creates an article and someone comes along and tags it for notability, why do they not address it as soon as it happens? If one person questions its notability, another user is bound to come along and also question it and that editor might find nothing to help it pass the guidelines so they put it up for discussion, as I have done. If these films can be saved by adding something to pass WP:NFILM then great. The notability tag gets removed, which is my goal. Not sure why so many people cannot understand that these articles are being sent for discussion because of a tag that someone else placed on the article. Boggles the mind that an author of an article will leave a notability tag for 10 years (as some of the articles that I have put up for discussion) without even once trying to address the issue. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Do you think I have every article created on my watchlist?? I've forgotten the vast majority of what I created. If somebody tags an article I don't know about it.† Encyclopædius  06:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 10:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per the post-nom expansion work and sourcing that has been done.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 10:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.