Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConceiveAbilities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

ConceiveAbilities

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

All the sources are press releases or self-published. Does not appear to pass WP:ORG. ~TPW 18:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Illinois. Shellwood (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete ConceiveAbilities has only received brief mentions from secondary sources. That's not enough. ◇  Helen   Degenerate  ◆ 19:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Coverage in sources is only trivial. ProofRobust  20:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Everything I find is affiliated (including interviews and quotes with the founder talking about her own organization), from social media, from a blog, from the organization's own public relations, or an inclusion of a publication by the organization in a bibliography. There is a list of top 8 surrogacy centers that might have come close, but the write-up of this organization is a barely reworded version of their own PR. Nothing that passes WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Largoplazo (talk) 22:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails NCORP. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion.  HighKing++ 11:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.