Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concepts in the seduction community (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Concepts in the seduction community
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

These terms ("bitch shield," "demonstration of value") are not notable; they have not received the requisite recognition in reliable sources. Nor has the idea of "seduction community" jargon received such recognition, which might possibly justify keeping the article even if none of the terms were individually notable. "Neg" is the only one that might be worth keeping, but it would need a more neutral title than "Neg (seduction)," which was the page name before a merge. (Note that I nominated this recently, but that closed as no consensus due to a WP:TRAINWRECK. I'm nominating separately now.) Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 02:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Concur with the nom; while the "seduction community" itself is notable, the notability does not transfer to various related topics. They can be merged into the main article if appropriate. Kuguar03 (talk) 05:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per nominator. --Bobbyd2011 (talk) 08:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC) confirmed sockpuppet
 * Delete per nom. (I tell people off for saying just that, but here, what more is there to say?) Peridon (talk) 13:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing notable here. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Compilation of Urban Dictionary-type Dicdefs for a non-notable and non-encyclopedia worthy "community"... Slam dunk deletion here. Carrite (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.