Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conceptualeer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted pursuant to A7 & G11. Non-admin closure. Safiel (talk) 13:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Conceptualeer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Neologism red dog six  (talk) 03:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. If we accept the article at face value, it is about a neologism with no evidence of common usage. If we look a little further, it's thinly veiled promotion. Either way, it's afoul of policy. —C.Fred (talk) 03:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  03:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. Quite the epitome of a non-notable neologism, asking us to Google it right from the article page. It's his personal social media handle, and happily declares its own lack of notability. czar   &middot;   &middot;  03:54, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: I removed the vaguely related promotional material, but this is still a non-notable neologism that only seems to be used as the creator's username. – 296.x (talk) 04:00, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete At the very least, utterly non notable neologism. Promotional. I have tagged for A7 and G11. Safiel (talk) 04:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.