Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concerned Christians Canada Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Concerned Christians Canada Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No assertion of notability made: GNews brings up about 30 hits over the past few years, but no substantial coverage. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I've just been scanning the ghits, and found one I am very tempted to add to the article, although how much notability it shows I leave to others to decide first. http://www.gaycalgary.com/magazine.aspx?id=26&article=1054 Peridon (talk) 19:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The 2009 Ganesh incident seems to have provoked a couple of dedicated articles, the first with hundreds of comments, indicating that it was an issue of some significance in Calgary. I've added that information to the article.
 * Oh, and it should probably be moved to Concerned Christians Canada, which seems to be the generally recognized name. --  Theodolite  ➹  20:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There do seem to be other organisations with very similar names - I found one that seemed to be to do with (but not part of) the Latter Day Saints). Makes searching difficult. Peridon (talk) 21:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note I have moved the page to Concerned Christians Canada. OSbornarfcontribs. 21:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. I'm not finding the coverage in reliable sources. The elephant thing doesn't appear to have been significant, and the one or two articles on it are the only non-trivial coverage this group gets. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 04:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG for lack of indepth coverage. gets passing mentions in media. LibStar (talk) 07:32, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and LibStar.  PK  T (alk)  14:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.