Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concerto for Tuba and Orchestra (Broughton)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Concerto for Tuba and Orchestra (Broughton)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to be no substantial coverage. Current sources are not independent. The entry in the standard Tuba rep book (which has virtually every published tuba piece) is very minimal, suggesting minimal importance.  Aza24  (talk)   17:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The SandDoctor  Talk 17:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   Aza24  (talk)   17:15, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I found mentions in programs and in a few newspaper articles about performers, but nothing more than that. It's telling that it wasn't a significant enough piece to have any narrative prose in the Bruce Broughton article. Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Schazjmd   (talk)  16:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.