Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conchita Espinosa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was withdrawn. —Animum (talk) 20:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Conchita Espinosa

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable musician. As an aside, a Google search returns no hits. —Animum (talk) 01:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A professor at 14? Yeah, right. This is purely a hoax. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:46, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by Ssbohio. Give me the golden foot-in-mouth award... Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I actually know who this guy is. And just because you can't manage to become a professor at 14 doesn't mean other people can't do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friedchikinz (talk • contribs) 02:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Sourced, with 511 Ghits, but possibly needs a rewrite to distance it from a copyvio. --Ssbohio (talk) 02:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, where was all that when I Googled that name? Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The editor who started the article blanked it and said in the edit summary that they requested it be deleted. I have placed the correct speedy delete tag since the editor has made 3 of the 6 edits to the page (7 if you count me adding the tag).  TJ   Spyke   03:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I've done a fairly substantial rewrite of the article. I removed the speedy tag on that basis, as the original editor is no longer the only substantial contributor.  More editing is needed.  --Ssbohio (talk) 03:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ssbohio. Maxamegalon2000 06:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - now excellently rewritten, the subject is both noteable and interesting and the AfD should probably never have been made. --Arcanios (talk) 09:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep the substantial rewrite speaks for itself. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Y'all are going to make me blush, seriously... :-) However, much more needs to be done to improve this article, which essentially relies on a single source plus some common knowledge.   The Google results should provide a starting point.  Lately, I've tried to pick an XfD at random and participate, seeing if the article was salvageable;  I had no idea who Conchita Espinosa was before I dug in here.  It just goes to show what can be done if we stop the drumbeat for deletion long enough to listen for anything worth saving.  Merry Christmas!  --Ssbohio (talk) 00:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.