Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concilocusaphobia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 04:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Concilocusaphobia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a hoax; searches using Google, Google Books, and Google Scholar have yielded no results that might confirm the subject's existence. My WP:PROD tag was removed by the creator with no explanation given, other than the addition to the article of this text. Unscented (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if true, this would be a dictionary def and not, uh, suitable here.  --Lockley (talk) 20:56, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. By the article's own admission it is a non-notable neologism. --DanielRigal (talk) 21:00, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's a new phobia that has no documentation to support it. -- Whpq (talk) 21:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a protologism or a possible hoax.   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 23:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete WP:SNOW has fallen upon this probably hoax. JBsupreme (talk) 04:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.