Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concurrent user

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 00:46, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

Concurrent user
Extremely minimal dicdef. Hasn't been expanded in 11 months, and I don't see that happening...ever. Wikitionary if they want it, but delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 18:42, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, harmless stub. I expanded it a bit. Thue | talk 19:28, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename, and add a disambig at Concurrence which is currently only about the legal kind. Radiant! 20:20, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, this can be defined more than a page in Wiktionary. Tygar 22:42, Mar 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, more than a dicdef. Needs refs, though - David Gerard 14:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; okay it's expanded a little. &mdash; RJH 18:10, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.