Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conduit (Mythology)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under G7. — ξ xplicit  01:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Conduit (Mythology)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced, in-universe original research. Even the article states that it "is rumored to be true". I42 (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You know I'm going to put this in a sandbox and you delete this. I'll tell you when you can delete this. Okay? --Schmeater (talk) 21:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. No references to this, and if anything, it would belong in the Conduit (series) article.  There's not enough in here to stand on its own. Directly to Schmeater, that's not how AFD - or Wikipedia, for that matter - works. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 21:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey do a speedy deletion right now, I don't need this page anymore! --Schmeater (talk) 23:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Changing !vote to Speedy Delete G7 (author request) per above request by article's primary author. Have a nice day. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 00:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.