Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confidence fairy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –MuZemike 02:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Confidence fairy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability. Magister Scienta talk  (8 November 2011)  16:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge into some better-established article such as consumer confidence or animal spirits. Warden (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete While the term "confidence fairy" certainly turns up a lot in a Google search, there is no hard evidence that all uses of the term can trace back to Krugman's use, and since Krugman's creation of the term (rather than the term itself) appears to be the point of the article, without verifiability, the article really has no point at all. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:18, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking independent third party sources for it's content. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.