Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Configuramming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Configuramming

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources provided whatsoever. Google turns up nothing at all. Seems to be a word made up by the initial contributor. Only other edits to article are by a bot and someone adding a no sources template. Elbowdrop 01:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- Most likly a school kid making up a word and posting it on wikipedia ChrisLamb 01:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete So all this is basically saying is that if it's not complex it's not programming but if it's a significant change it's not exactly configuration. Hence, configuramming???  The isolated lingo of a bored and confusing programmer... --David Andreas 01:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. We are not for the introduction of non-notable computer jargon - let alone dicdefs.  If you want Urban Dictionary, you know where to find it. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 02:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per neologism guidelines. --Haemo 02:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; only ghits are to Wikipedia. John Vandenberg 09:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't even come off as non-notable computer jargon, clearly a neologism, and a terrible one at that. -- Jimmi Hugh 12:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like a joke neologism. Acalamari 18:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Debivort 06:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.