Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conflict behavior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mind matrix  00:06, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Conflict behavior
Tagged as a speedy with the reasoning


 * "1. "Conflict behavior" does not appear to mean what the editor says it does (e.g. google it w/ and w/o "fidgeting"). 2. The bulk of this page was pasted in from "Psychology". 3. The editor didn't finish: ("I'm amazed if you've read this far.")"

No opinion WhiteNight T 01:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The text of the page appears to be cut-and-paste, with large sections having little-or-nothing to do with the subject of the article. If an expert and sift the wheat from the chaff then it may make a legitimate claim to existing on WP.  As it stands, delete. -- (aeropagitica) [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|25px|UK]] 01:57, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete possible copyvio...no, looks like it is a copyvio...speedy--MONGO 11:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I nominated this article for deletion, according to the reasons listed above. (Do you need to be an admin to vote? Is it okay to vote on an article that you nominated?) --Shunpiker 18:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No, you don't need to be an admin to nominate or vote. I think that a nomination is generally counted as a vote to delete, unless otherwise specified. However, it doesn't hurt to also vote to make it explicit. If you do, it's a good idea to mention that you're the nominator. -Rholton 15:27, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Is it really a copyvio? From where? To the above: anyone can vote, though only an admin can close the voting process once some consensus is reached. And yes, unless you say otherwise, it's implied that if you nominate an article for deletion, then you are voting "delete". --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 23:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Rewrite from scratch - as others have said, this is mostly cobbled together from bits of other Wikipedia articles. A Google shows "conflict behavior" exists as a term, but it does not refer to fidgeting etc. Tearlach 03:51, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. From what I can tell, this is a purely descriptive phrase, with no definite meaning beyond "behavior in/during conflict". Therefore, it would be at best a dicdef. -Rholton 15:27, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article appears to be a couple of original (?) paragraphs followed by a cut-and-paste of the entire Psychology article. As such, it is too trivial and unencyclopedic to stand on its own. MCB 04:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.