Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confluential Assembly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  18:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Confluential Assembly

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism / original research. Google had never seen the phrase until it saw this article. No references. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete, Confluential isn't even a word and the term as a whole is clearly made up. Usrnme h8er (talk · contribs) 11:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I can't find any evidence that this concept exists outside this article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per above. The term "confluential" does appear as a specialized word in scholarly literature, but zero google hits (other than this article itself) on the phrase is enough to convince me to delete this.  Cazort (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.