Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confucius Institute at Khon Kaen University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:33, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Confucius Institute at Khon Kaen University

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I fail to see how this CI among all the others is notable. So it won an Institute of the year award... big deal of self-promotion  Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 14:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to  Khon Kaen University. This is only an affiliated organisation  on  the KK uni campus.   Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Oh ... I'm staring both at your name, and at the name of the subject of the article.  There isn't a COI that you might want to declare now, is there?   ;-) --Epeefleche (talk) 08:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied on your talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Mea culpa. Severe oversight on my part! -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 09:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:15, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect or Delete. This does not meet our requirements for a stand-alone article.  If a redirect is created, it may make sense to add some explanatory material to the target, so as not to mislead readers into thinking that it is part of the university -- rather than merely affiliated with it.  I'm not sure, in the normal course, that mere affiliation is sufficient for a redirect -- for these reasons -- but would be interested in the views of others.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.