Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CongTV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject does not meet English Wikipedia's notability standards to qualify for an article. North America1000 00:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

JoaquinVlogs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG; non-notable YouTuber with no readily identifiable independent WP:RS coverage.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment He has 1.3 million youtube subs, which means he likely has substantial converge for WP:GNG. The thing that's confusing to me that he's getting an English Wikipedia article before one at Tagalog Wikipedia article, as that's what most of his content seems to be in. - Scarpy (talk) 23:23, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * In response to your comment, most online Philippine media publications are either wholly in English or primarily in English (with only some Tagalog websites, usually Facebook or Entertainment pages and the like). As such, when looking for coverage about Philippine-related subjects, English sources are perfectly acceptable. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Redditaddict69 01:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep due to YouTuber having a subscriber base slightly over the 1 million mark. Kirbanzo (talk) 02:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No indepth coverage from reliable sources. All I can find are short mentions, not indepth articles about him. --GRuban (talk) 14:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88(talk) 20:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No clear consensus is evident... Re-listing once again.
 * Comment Having over a million subscribers is nothing that significant nowadays. He is ranked 5,300 in subscriber rank and 19,995 in video view rank according to Social Blade -, there are thousands of people who are ranked higher but don't have an article on them. Sourcing would be the key here to establish notability. Also his channel name is Cong TV rather than CongTV. Hzh (talk) 12:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes  23:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Number of views/subs alone don't signify notability and other than these this person has no significant coverage in any reliable sources.Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 01:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete No Reliable sources found also no significant coverage on subject. ShunDream (talk) 11:02, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This subject fails GNG and all biography-related tests. Also, this article is highly promotional. Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 13:50, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Number of views does not meet criteria for inclusion. No coverage in RS sources.MLKLewis (talk) 00:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.