Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conker's Other Bad Fur Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Conker (series). (non-admin closure)  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   05:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Conker's Other Bad Fur Day

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article, which has no properly formatted references, is nearly incomprehensible. It states that there is very little information, and there is not enough intelligible information to warrant an article about whatever. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect - to Conker (series), where it's mentioned briefly (and more coherently). If an article about this cancelled game can be carved out into a stand-alone article, this attempt surely didn't prove it possible. Sergecross73   msg me  02:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect Conker (series) not notable in own right, no WP:RS KylieTastic (talk) 13:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Conker (series) it isn't notable but I don't think it needs a deletion. Gary &#34;Roach&#34; Sanderson (talk) 00:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Conker (series), while some cancelled games have enough coverage to warrant a separate article this is not one of them.--64.229.167.158 (talk) 02:06, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Conker (series). Fails WP:GNG. Coverage from reliable video game sources on this topic is extremely sparse with only a few mentions. --The1337gamer (talk) 11:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect: to Conker (series). Not notable enough for an article, but would be a good addition the the Conker (series) article. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.