Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conlin's Furniture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 21:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Conlin's Furniture

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails GNG CerealKillerYum (talk) 05:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as searches found some links but this is still questionable at best. SwisterTwister   talk  05:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep This is an old article and poorly sourced. However, A regional chain founded in 1937 with 16 stores is almost certainly notable.  I'll add a few sources, but, I feel rather strongly that this is the sort of article that any editor would do better to source or tag rather than delete.  Over-aggressive deletion can be as destructive to the project as other kinds of drive-by editing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * sourcing added a few news articles, all of the papers in the region have coverage of this retail chain going back decades, I used what came to the top of a Proquest Newspaper search, there's lots more out there. And, certainly the article can be improved, expanded form RS.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep With the new content added by E.M.Gregory, this now meets WP:CORPDEPTH and passes WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.