Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ConnMan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

ConnMan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable product. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:11, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm usually a deletionist and was all ready to !vote that way based on the completely worthless sources cited, which amount to two obviously WP:SPS blog posts and a link to the download site.  But Googling quickly turned up an ArsTechnica article, a book] and an article on scholar.  I think this qualifies as multiple reliable independent secondary sources and is enough to establish notability.  (We often accept far less.)  Since our only concern at AfD is notability, which we decide based on available sources, not merely the sources cited, I must !vote to keep.  I'm as surprised as anyone.  Msnicki (talk) 03:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep&mdash;Msnicki's research is convincing. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 08:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. ConnMan is fairly niche with the major Linux desktop environments having gone with NetworkManager, but it does still see some use with Enlightenment, for example. Dolescum (talk) 02:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Generally interesting software, good to know what makes my smartphone tick (this is an encyclopedia, right?), mentioned in the media available in Debian: https://packages.debian.org/de/sid/connman User:ScotXW t@lk 06:44, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: this software recieved its share of significant coverage as demonstrated by Msnicki. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 19:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.