Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connect Support Services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Connect Support Services

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not specify why the subject/entity is notable or any major attributes. Poorly sourced. —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 18:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Weak Keep. Not entirely unsourced, but the two articles quoted aren't really about the _company_ per se.  However, they do show it has been the subject of some media attention; enough for WP:CORP?  Perhaps. Tevildo (talk) 19:41, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Trivial mentions and press citations of company spokesmen are rarely enough to demonstrate notability. While its research occasionally gets press attention, a Gsearch shows a large number of directory-type listings. Ohconfucius (talk) 02:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another non-consumer tech services business.  As regards this business itself, the coverage cited is not significant, and not primarily about this business.  The article text seems remarkably evasive about what they actually make or do. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep – I believe there is just enough coverage from independent – reliable – 3rd party sources to warrant inclusion here at Wikipedia. Thanks ShoesssS Talk 11:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Has reliable references and with some rewording would make an okay article. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 19:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.