Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connecthings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Connecthings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was recreated after G11 speedy deletion. It is still a G11 promo violation but a second speedy deletion is not permitted so we have to go through this process. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment A WP:BEFORE search delivers nothing more substantial than PR pieces in "trade magazine" websites and a few mere mentions in other sources. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

The page contains verifiable facts in a neutral point of view as per the guidelines cited on Wikipedia. If there are any changes that you can suggest so that it doesn't appear to violate G11, please advise and it can be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B.poole (talk • contribs) 14:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:SNOW - Purely promotional, no encyclopaedic content to salvage and no notability. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt as SNOW given the fact this has been deleted 3 times in the last few months for both advertising and copypasted website information and the current is no different at all, our policies against advertising are violated here but it's worse if it continues when it's clear such advertising (regardless of whatever or whoever) is mirrored. SwisterTwister   talk  21:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promotional piece -reads like a company press release not an encyclopedia article. Article created by WP:SPA whose only edits involve this article. A number of sources listed in article don't mention the company at all.  CBS 527 Talk 00:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.