Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conner Rayburn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep without prejudice against a re-nomination for individual articles. This is too many articles, only tangentially related to each other, for there to be any meaningful consensus. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS please relist seperately. -Doc ask?  12:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Conner Rayburn
This is a child actor that appeared in 5 episodes. Not notable. And the same goes for more soap opera child actors (funny, several of them played Kyle Jenkins on The Young and the Restless). IMO, cildren that appear in the show without singificant contribution, do not belong into enciclopedia. MAybe when they become adult and perform in prominent productions with important roles but certainly not now.
 * Ellis Hollins
 * Marissa Poer
 * Madison Poer
 * Amanda and Rachel Pace
 * Oliver Guynes
 * Garrett, Spencer and Mitchell Gray
 * Cooper Guynes
 * Amy and Emily Walton
 * Scott and Zachary Benes
 * Bronwyn Tosh
 * Brenna Tosh
 * Alena and Gabrielle LeBerger
 * Rebecca and Vanessa Rogers
 * Jason and Kristopher Simmons
 * Cali and Noelle Sheldon
 * Kara and Shelby Hoffman
 * Aaron Aulsebrook-Walker
 * Alyssa, Jaden and Brandon Morgan
 * Rebecca Pike

--Ton e 21:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Imarek 00:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep all w/o prejudice toward separate relisting. Some of these are clearly notable actors, whatever their ages -- The Tosh sisters, for example, were in 30-odd episodes of Six Feet Under, while Hollins is credited with an apparently notable award nomination -- while others are just working as interchangeable bits of stage business. They should be listed separately (preferably over several days). Monicasdude 00:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and re-nominate per Monicasdude. Eivindt@c 00:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Withdraw and renominate individually Thatcher131 01:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Getting your mug on TV a few times (and not making any further impact) is a meaningless measure of encyclopedic worth. Child-actor-cruft. --Calton | Talk 05:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No vote -- Concur with the "renominate individually" camp -- I don't mind voting on 2 or 3 articles with the same subject or source, but this looks like a class-delete, and it'll be schools again next -- Simon Cursitor 07:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I see I nominated too many people at the same time. If you think any of them is notable enough,just remove it from the list. Shall we start voting again, I think that is the procedure. --Ton e 07:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No Vote -- Simon Cursitor 14:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete them all nn group. Carlossuarez46 05:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete mainly non-notable JackO&#39;Lantern 05:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although I agree with Tone, if there are any particularly identifiable children, a case should be made for them. (For example, I'm personally for the Kara and Shelby Hoffman page as they have appeared in both television, and a mainstream film. Daydream believer2 01:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep all This mass nomination is unacceptable. The onus shouldn't be on me to check which ones are notable. Hawkestone 02:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.