Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Corleone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Connie Corleone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

More Godfathercruft. Character fails WP:GNG - only source is Blogspot.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 02:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 02:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 02:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 02:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Google News link above shows many newspaper articles that deal with this specific character, including WaPo And NYT. Just because the sources aren't currently in the article doesn't mean the GNG is not met. Jclemens (talk) 06:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Which ones are you talking about? I found only mentions in articles about the films and an unrelated musician. A bunch of name-drops don't equal substantial coverage.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 11:00, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete As noted by Trescott, the reliable sources that mention the article subject do so only incidentally, in passing - there is no real in-depth coverage of the article subject itself. Nwlaw63 (talk) 13:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Corleone family or Delete. The Google News stories seem to be about The Godfather series or Talia Shire herself, rather than the character.  I think a merge is probably called for, but I would support deletion as a fallback. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep A significant character with a role in the plot in an extremely famous film? and also in the famous novel-- That's certainly enough reason for a separate article. For films & novels of this importance, the distinction is between those characters who are just background, and those who have an actual role in the events.  In both, the events involving here are unforgettable. Has anyone actually checking in the by now fairly extensive literature of the works?   DGG ( talk ) 01:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A small role in the novel and three films does not justify keeping this weak stand-alone article. Poor content; obvious padding. — &#124; Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh Buzzard&#124; — 08:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.