Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Traut (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 21:28, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Connor Traut
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability presumably rests entirely on unsourced "youngest elected official" claim. Lareda Ranch Civic Council appears to be an advisory board with no powers. Fails WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. JeffreyAtW (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sounds like a wonderful young man who may someday meet our notability requirements. -- Versa geek  22:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – Effectively a member of a local homeowner's association, which does not make him a notable elected official per our requirements. Harej (talk) 22:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – membership in a local community group isn't notable. Fitnr (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, not at all notable at this time. Perhaps later, but WP:TOOSOON right now.   GregJackP   Boomer!   01:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Very obviously a vanity page, maintained tendentiously against attempts at a multi-sided perspective by the subject of the page using multiple accounts. The fact that a person is elected to an advisory body that discusses water supply issues once a month does not make that person notable, regardless of (unverified and, given the obscure nature of such bodies, likely unverifiable) claims about the person's record-setting age. Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 04:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, wildly non-notable. Hairhorn (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.