Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connotea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. –  Rob e  rt  04:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Connotea
not notable Sleepyhead 09:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 16:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google implies otherwise . -- JJay 22:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep 285,000 google hits (excluding self-references) and Sleepyhead, you should be very careful about trying to make a point just because you are feeling churlish your own pet article was not kept. Eusebeus 22:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 04:01Z 
 * Keep per above Werdna648T/C\@ 10:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. If you delete this, then you should also delete all links to del.icio.us, yahoo, simpy, blinklist, digg, furl, tagtooga, google, etc.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.