Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conor Masterson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. While it's clear that he does not meet WP:NFOOTY, that is irrelevant if he can meet the WP:GNG. There is no clear consensus on this point. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Conor Masterson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing has changed since the first AfD notability-wise. Still fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG and all that. Tagged G4 by, but it doesn't qualify. ansh 666 22:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm okay with draftification, if it comes to that. ansh 666 00:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  22:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  22:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  22:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT - still fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 07:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt Fail WP:NFOOTBALL and this deletion will be third deletion. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No reason to salt if it's deleted, this is only the second deletion and it's only because of his contested sudden rise in notability. SportingFlyer  talk  04:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - being an unused sub, even in the Champions League, does not confer notability -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep for now More than 1500 views in 3 days, people want to find out who the guy is. It’s weird a player can be on the bench for a quarter final of the champions league and not have a Wikipedia page, people expect to find one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hildreth gazzard (talk • contribs) 17:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Currently fails WP:NFOOTBALL but do a before search, he clearly passes WP:GNG (and will probably pass WP:NFOOTBALL within days.) SportingFlyer  talk  07:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete currently fails NFooty, and recreate if he does make his fully pro debut. Govvy (talk) 15:33, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment to show he clearly passes WP:GNG even though WP:NFOOTBALL isn't met (for the next couple weeks at least):    . Deleting this article would be non-sensical. At the very least it should be draftified. SportingFlyer  talk  05:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, a professional footballer who has not played in a professional football match. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 12:57, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete he will likely go on to make his senior debut soon but at present he simply doesn't pass WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 13:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep article appears to meet GNG, based on the majority of the links above provided by SportingFlyer, and the Independent reference at the main article. Eldumpo (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. To my mind the sources presented in the article and here do not satisfy GNG as they are in the main local sources, blog posts, or hype articles speculating how good this player might be, consensus about these are they are not suitable for GNG. Fenix down (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify as per suggestion by SportingFlyer. Whilst the page views now are high, it is because of the fact he was listed on the subs bench so there is a curiosity factor that'll ease if nothing else noteworthy happens any time soon. However, an upcoming player who gets to the bench may well become "someone", so I agree that taking the article out of mainspace and seeing if it can be developed in draft is a good move for now. Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.