Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conscientiology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 16:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Conscientiology
Delete: Non-notable neologism, connected to a one-man pseudoscience thing. Must have been on Wikipedia and got deleted earlier, as a different article of that name is still mirrored from Wikipedia on other sites. Lukas 09:43, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. It looks like the page was previously deleted for copyvio previously. enochlau (talk) 10:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Unverifiable original-research stuff.  From iacworld.org: Whereas conventional sciences are based on the Cartesian-Newtonian model, which considers reality to be unidimensional (physical only), conscientiology is based on the consciential paradigm, which considers reality to be multidimensional... Modern technology is still not sophisticated enough to detect, analyze, and study the more subtle dimensions where consciousness can manifest itself.   &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 10:28Z 
 * Delete per nom. Edgar181 16:11, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. OR and Bollocks.  Barno 16:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research Prashanthns 18:13, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. While there is apparently a "Journal of Conscientiology", I've looked on a number of university library catalogs   and can't find it, nor any references to "conscientiology" that can verify. --Aude 02:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --NaconKantari 22:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.