Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consciousness magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Consciousness magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Relatively new magazine with no indications of notability. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. I found no signs of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. When looking for sources, be sure not to mistake it with Health Consciousness Magazine, Sage of Consciousness Magazine, Light of Consciousness Magazine, Super Consciousness Magazine, Anthropology Of Consciousness Magazine, Christ Consciousness Magazine, Collective Consciousness Magazine, Awaken Consciousness Magazine or Journal of Awakening Consciousness. — Rankiri (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Strongly promotional in tone as well: The editorial is community orientated, embracing ethnicity and diversity, in hopes of bringing different cultures together in peace and friendship. Consciousness is also a diverse and testimonial publication that address many social issues.  Besides, I prefer Unconsciousness Magazine, myself. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I've been through the references present as I post. The motivational whatsit one is a story by a founder of the mag. PRLog is a press release (and says so). Anthro21 is a blog. A classic how-not-to, especially as the reference point for Nos 1 and 3 seems to have evaporated leaving them hanging. As for the celebrities (I must say I'd not heard of three of them before - and am unlikely to remember them - while the fourth was a name only), notability doesn't cascade down. They've been 'highlighted'. OK. So? Like Smerdis, I dislike 'embracing' when it occurs in articles, but give them credit for not having 'solutions'. Peridon (talk) 19:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above comments. I had PRODded this as a non-notable magazine lacking significant coverage elsewhere, and remain of that view.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 00:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, and promotional in nature. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:47, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.