Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consecutivism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete G11, by Jimfbleak. — Sarilox (talk) 06:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Consecutivism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable unreferenced art theory, advertising the work of a single artist Wuh  Wuz  Dat  17:43, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: as WP:OR. Toddst1 (talk) 17:52, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:Notability WP:Verifiability WP:Neologism. Pburka (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is the style of one particular artist, Vinesh Sukumaran, who does not have an article in Wikipedia. When and if a Wikipedia article is created on this artist, the subject can be covered in his article. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 21:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, not a genuine school of art. Hairhorn (talk) 03:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.