Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservation and restoration training


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Conservation and restoration training

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a directory, based almost entirely on primary sources (entries on individual universities' course catalogs), not a legitimate encyclopedia article. PROD was contested with no explanation other than enough here to merit full discussion at AfD. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:46, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, as per WP:NOTDIRECTORY, and also as it's a bit of a list, but not of notable things. CT55555 (talk) 23:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Lists.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete clearly per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.