Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative Christian Dragon fiction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Conservative Christian Dragon fiction

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable term. Written about by one guy, once. Neither the guy nor the books he described with the term are apparently notable enough to have pages, either; I see no reason why this needs to exist. Roscelese (talk) 07:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  —Roscelese (talk) 07:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  —Roscelese (talk) 07:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Alot of WP:OR with some WP:SYNTH and a dash of WP:COATRACK is how I would describe this article. Completely fails WP:N and as such, not worthy of inclusion.  - Pmedema (talk) 13:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete--Can't find anything on this, other than one book that continually comes up tagged with the term. Seems to be a term one guy came up with that didn't catch on. Agree that there is a lot of WP:OR here.  Susan118   talk  16:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems to be a retelling of one magazine article. Not suitable for a WP article, although an interesting topic. Lots of science fiction warns about possible bad things happening in the future. I guess if the government is the bad guys it's conservative and if it's a big multinational (or multi-planetary) corportation it's liberal. I was kind of expecting the article to be about guys like J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis who were Christians and wrote stories with dragons in them. Borock (talk) 16:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like quite non-notable, and there seems to be a lot of original research. No sources. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:56, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.