Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative Forum for Unitarian Universalists


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Unitarian Universalist Independent Affiliate organizations. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 18:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Closer's note: There is no content worth merging. The first two sentences were or are now duplicated in the suggested target. The last sentence is not written from a neutral point of view and thus doesn't merit merging. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 18:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Conservative Forum for Unitarian Universalists

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

More crUUft. I suspect this organization must have the same membership numbers as Islamists for Pigs' Knuckles. My search for reliable sources did not prove me wrong. (See and .) Lack of reliable sources means that the organization is non-notable and the article should be deleted. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 17:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 
 * Delete non-notable UU cruft Bigdaddy1981 03:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 05:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Delete as WP:VSCA, just another *cruft article about a non-notable organisation that does not meet the relevant policy. Thewinchester (talk) 06:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Unitarian Universalist Independent Affiliate organizations along with all the other articles Guycalledryan 08:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge I agree with Guycalledryan. --Devin Murphy 19:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Unitarian Universalist Independent Affiliate organizations. Bigdaddy1981 22:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I see how it could be merged, but per the "Pigs' Knuckles" argument, it's not notable. --DodgerOfZion 04:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.