Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative Pulse

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 14:50, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Conservative Pulse
"As of April 25, 2005, the forum had 421 registered members, with the most members ever online at once being 67." Smacks of vanity and self-promotion. Virtually none of the 2,000+ Google hits are relevant. See also Austin Cassidy and Stephen Covington.
 * Delete. Vanity. -- BD2412 talk 02:39, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reason as above. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 06:12, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, vanity.  Kaibabsquirrel 06:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. JamesBurns 08:08, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable. Blackcats 09:56, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. carmeld1 06:32, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

^ rather obvious pawns


 * Keep this article was targeted by a radical left-winger for deletion based largely upon the political leaning of the site. Subject site has logged over 1 million hits in the past year.  Similar articles exist for Free Republic and Democratic Underground. Afcassidy 06:05, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep ConservativePulse is an established internet forum for political dialogue and discussion. A Google search for the name reveals three pages of results, most of which are relevant to the site itself and involve discussions on other sites about CP.  Khatores
 * Keep It seems as though this person has never even gone to the site. But, I guess it is easier for this person to throw a fit instead of actually trying to compete. But I guess that's the communist way. Superbug
 * Keep Of all the sites I frequent, this one is the most relevant. As a constant lurker, I find the discussion there quite stimulating, even though I am an infrequent contributor.KhendonZ
 * Keep In addition to aforementioned votes in regards to outside note of the website, ConservativePulse has had its own interviews with presidential primary contenders and is a focal point for several local politicians & candidates both in the major and minor political parties of the US. The One True Fred
 * Rather obvious sockpuppets, methinks. RadicalSubversiv E 14:16, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Rather weak jab at other users, methinks. The One True Fred


 * ignorant of rules newbie Seems to be an advertisement of the existence of the site. At the same time it does tell you about a site you might come across, which is informative. If Wilki has a policy of keeping information about discussion sites, then keep. If not, then delete. No knowledge about whether the article is accurate or biased in the way it describes the site. if it is seriously biased then maybe it should be corrected and kept.Sandpiper


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.