Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative Punk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash talk 03:09, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Conservative Punk
A non-notable website, Alexa ranking 579,519. The sub-genre/culture itself (if you call it that) may well be worthy of an article, however this isn't it. Randwicked 09:51, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable spam.  Try WikiDirectory instead. --StuffOfInterest 14:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Fairly notable among punk listeners. Low Alexa ranking is due to that the site was more popular around election times. Punkmorten 21:31, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB karmafist 18:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The website is quite notable amongst punk fans such as myself. Although, it should probably be a disambig, with a page for the movement being the main article. Bands like the Dropkick Murphys are now achieving much success playing a conserative brand of punk, whereas the website has lost any mainstream appeal after 2004. AKMask 03:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I'm a punk fan also, but never really heard about this till I came across it from typing in "anti flag sucks" on Google, just to see what people thought of anti-flag, then I found this on here after typing in it in search and I believe I also came across it from the article on Michael Graves of Misfits fame. It would be better it was restructed as a representing a movement within the punk scene and not just one website (as there are more blogs out there run by conservative punks). Conservative punk is one big oxymoron though... --Saint-Paddy 01:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.