Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:01, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Conservative movie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Uncited list, based completely on original research. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 20:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as inherently POV WillOakland (talk) 20:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Rename the list is reliable and has its reasons on http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=YWQ4MDlhMWRkZDQ5YmViMDM1Yzc0MTE3ZTllY2E3MGM= which is a reliable site published by a reliable association National Review. The name of the list is rather misleading as to be a definition of what a conservative movie is but it's more of a list of conservative films.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as copyvio. Reproducing the entirety of this list surely constitutes a violation of National Review's copyright in their article that originally presented it. JulesH (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not sure that a list like this is encyclopaedic. There's too much room for argument and worse. Besides, it's a list of films 'thought' to have something. That's POV straight off. Who thinks, and why are they considered reliable as thinkers of this? And anyway, what's the point of the list? Peridon (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since besides the copyvio issue there is an obvious problem of verifiability here, related to the matter of definition (or authority). You could rename this article "Conservative movies according to the National Review" to get around the business of editors' taste, but what would be the point of that? None. Drmies (talk) 23:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - POV nightmare. - Biruitorul Talk 06:14, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Was gonna say the same thing as Drmies. Also, from a format standpoint, this would be more appropriate as a category (something like Category:National Review's list of "conservative movies"), but it would be a hard category to maintain since people would be edit warring with it over numerous articles. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 14:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as observed, the only rational way would be List of conservative movies according to the National Review, but what would be the point of such a list? Without forgetting that there isn't a chance in hell that a list so named could pass WP:N.--Aldux (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom RP459 (talk) 19:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete "...a film thought to have" -- it gets into unsourced POV from the very get-go. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Individual movies can find consensus to be called "Conservative" if desired, this would be an Edit War gone wild. — Ched ~ (yes?)/© 07:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.