Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Maybe affiliated with a corporation (User name was something like this, he changed it). Person who created it is involved with this, maybe bias and advertising. Ob tund Talk 03:00, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Although many of the references are primary and published by the group itself, there is enough coverage in reliable, independent sources to convince me that the group is notable. Possible affiliation with a corporation (they often donate to non-profits) is not a reason for deletion. If nominator detects bias and advertising, remove and correct such shortcomings through the normal editing process.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  03:28, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I can't sense any bias in it - in fact, I helped removed it during the AFC stage of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 15:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 15:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 15:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep There are lots of primary newspaper sources here such as the New Jersey news, philly.com, a NY Times blog site. It looks like an environmental foundation. --Artene50 (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep There is enough coverage to prove WP:GNG Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.