Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consolitis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Consolitis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable term, not to mention the references are Urban Dictionary and a website that's hasn't been active for three years. A google search turns this article and the references in question. MattParker 119 (talk) 01:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Urban Dictionary is a user-submitted website packed full of amusing, made-up stuff, and is pretty much the exact opposite of a reliable source. Then, we have a couple of references to gamer blog posts.  Also not reliable sources.  The article has a long list of video games that the author thinks suffer from this "affliction".  That's all original research as it is all unreferenced.  Delete per our guideline on non-notable neologisms.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  02:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Urban dictionary doesn't cut it for me. --Legis (talk - contribs) 09:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:NOTNEO. Lack of reliable sources, the list of games that are included is WP:OR, etc etc. Sergecross73   msg me   14:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Using UrbanDic as a source? Really? Hell, I'm on there, so it's clearly as far from reliable as can be.   Salvidrim!   20:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Surely the description of you is accurate, isn't it, Salvidrim? Precisely how many thousands of sites do you participate in?  Do you have time to eat or sleep, or are you a bot?  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  21:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't sleep. Google suggests About 7,890 results. The top ten include my Twitter, Facebook, G+, Youtube, EBay Wikipedia page (User and talk!) and personal website.... interesting.  Salvidrim!   21:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: No reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a very real problem and should be here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.49.83 (talk) 11:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.