Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conspiracy Theory (Tupac Shakur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mr.Z-man 03:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Conspiracy Theory (Tupac Shakur)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Entirely Original Research and theory. Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete soapy OR essay. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 23:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete So much wrong with this article. Pure cruft, original research, essay, unencyclopedic and just plain goofy. Dman727 (talk) 01:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * What can a Wikipedian do when half the people voted for George W.? Delete JuJube (talk) 01:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * They can import political drama into deletion discussions, I suppose.
 * Delete along with Blac haze. You can throw in a WP:BLP violation if such a person exists. WillOakland (talk) 01:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as complete bollocks. --MCB (talk) 05:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Number of people who will have !voted delete in this discussion, if another person does so after me = 7! AndyJones (talk) 07:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Violates WP:V. Not quite original research by the author but still a non-notable conspiracy theory. Also WP:RS can debunk the Blac Haze is Tupac assertion. The theory gets a few passing mentions in the reputable media lumped in along with others. This article's substance is a rehash of various conspiracy sites. Wikipedia is not a publisher of urban legends. • Gene93k (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Snowball delete It's somewhere between OR synthesis and total bollocks. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, non-notable fringe theory.  00:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Author has duplicated the article on their userpage. . Edward321 (talk) 00:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.